Jay Clarke vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 May at 11:33 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Clarke vs N. Fatic

GBR
3
Win
Played
0
Win

BIH
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Clarke 3 - 0 Fatic
They have played 6 sets in total, with Jay Clarke winning 6 and Nerman Fatic winning 0. The last match between Jay Clarke and Nerman Fatic was at the Skopje Challenger, 24-05-2025, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Jay Clarke getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Clarke | 3 |
Fatic | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(F) Skopje Challenger(05-24-25)
(SF) M25 Santa Margherita di Pula(10-11-24)
(F) M25 Antalya(11-26-23)
J. Clarke vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
J. Clarke vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- Currently, Clarke is slightly less effective on their second serve, securing 41.1% of points, compared to Fatic's 42.09%. Will this minor edge influence the outcome?
- Clarke excels in return games, claiming 44.93% of second serve points. Meanwhile, Fatic trails closely with a 44.7% success rate in the same area.
- In first serve returns, Fatic has a marginal lead, winning 30.37% of points compared to Clarke's 29.65%.
- Facing breakpoints, Fatic has a slight advantage, saving 51.93% versus Clarke's 49.89%.
- Over the past year, Clarke has a slightly higher match win percentage at 69.79% compared to Fatic's 68.75%.
- Both players shine on clay, but Clarke is slightly stronger with a 68% win rate versus Fatic's 61%.
- In terms of competition level, Clarke has thrived in lower-tier tournaments, with a 78.79% success rate, while Fatic competes more in mid-tier events at 57.58%.
- Head-to-head, Clarke has dominated, winning both past encounters without dropping a set.
- Fatic has played stronger-ranked opponents, averaging a ranking of 330.09, while Clarke's opponents have had an average rank of 413.23.
- In deciding sets, Fatic boasts a 60% win rate compared to Clarke's 52% in the past year.
- Fatic surpasses Clarke in break point conversion, achieving 40.66% compared to Clarke's 36.33%.
Editorial Prediction (May 24, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the upcoming match, several key factors emerge. Clarke's track record against Fatic is unblemished, with two victories in previous encounters. This psychological edge could play a pivotal role.
However, Fatic's slight advantage in saving breakpoints and converting them could prove crucial, particularly in pressure situations. His consistent performance against higher-ranked players and superior results in deciding sets also indicate his capabilities under tense conditions.
Assessing the overall statistics, Clarke's dominance on clay and higher previous success rates cannot be disregarded. Despite these strengths, Fatic's recent gains in specific performance metrics like first serve returns and breakpoints suggest an evolving threat.
Given these considerations, while Clarke enters as the favorite due to past head-to-head success, Fatic's upward trend in several key areas makes him a formidable opponent. Nevertheless, Clarke's comprehensive clay expertise and prior results would likely secure him as the winner in this upcoming match.
Jay Clarke vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Clarke vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
6 | Sets Won | 0 |
37 | Games Won | 17 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
1:37:2 | Average Match Time | 1:37:2 |
63% (109/174) | 1st Serve % | 67% (117/174) |
68% (74/109) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (68/117) |
62% (40/65) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (19/57) |
68% (13/19) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (4/11) |
50% (87/174) | Return Points Win % | 34% (60/174) |
100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Clarke Recent Matches Played
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

J. Clarke vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.59% (348/246) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.60% (402/284) |
56.55% (773/594) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.57% (886/653) |
52.60% (6761/6093) | Games Win/Loss | 53.04% (7547/6681) |
59.82% (131/88) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
67.45% (172/83) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.04% (340/217) |
46.58% (34/39) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44.19% (19/24) |
23.40% (11/36) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
1757 | Aces Total | 1560 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
1326 | Total Double Faults | 1501 |
1:38:20 | Average Match Time | 1:19:51 |
482.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.29 |
58% (22585/38840) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23571/35458) |
68% (15371/22585) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15427/23571) |
51% (8303/16255) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5709/11887) |
45% (1852/4157) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1953/4180) |
41% (16189/39164) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15481/35816) |
24.00% (6/19) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
33.33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
26.32% (5/14) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
49.26% (134/138) | Challenger W/L | 53.15% (118/104) |
73.45% (202/73) | Futures W/L | 63.30% (276/160) |
59% (341/574) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (393/659) |
23% (3/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
53% (92/175) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/154) |
56% (96/170) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/188) |
87% (345/299) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (392/346) |
13% (345/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (392/42) |
19% (249/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (294/57) |